Recognizing Baby Steps – Part 2
In a previous article of mine, Recognizing Baby Steps[1] a news article was reviewed where it was reported that a pregnant woman in the state of Texas was given a ticket for driving her car in the High Occupancy Vehicle Lane. According to the statute, two or more persons are required in the vehicle to legally use this lane. She is going to court to contest the ticket. Her argument is simple: she was pregnant and thus there were two persons in the vehicle. The argument was based on a recent Texas law recognizing the fetus as a living human being. She says she is not political by nature and doesn’t seek any special recognition. Texas has given her child legal status as a person and she only asks that she/he be recognized as a person under all legal circumstances. A novel argument to be sure, but certainly logical.
Just days ago (February 16, 2024), by a vote of 8 to 1, the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos can be considered children under state law.[2] This decision was in response to a couple who sued the medical facility that stored their frozen embryos. An apparently mentally ill patient broke into and vandalized the lab where the frozen embryos were kept and destroyed several of them. The parents of the embryos sued the laboratory for the wrongful death of their children. They initially lost the case in court but, on further appeals, the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that the embryos should be considered children under Alabama law.
The response from the pro-choice side of the political spectrum was as expected. One particularly extreme view, of many, was that, “If embryos are considered children, then from the moment of conception any and all women who have an embryo inside them could be subject to child abuse, manslaughter or even murder charges for virtually anything that they do that might be construed as being harmful to that child, including many forms of birth control.”[3]
From a practical perspective the most immediate consequence of the Court’s decision is that several medical facilities around the country have halted their IVF (in vitro fertilization) programs for fear of liability for damaged or lost embryos which might now be seen as real people.
The specter of politics has already become evident among politicians who are traditionally strongly supportive of pro-life issues. When questioned about the embryo loss numbers, the governor of Texas, reliably strongly pro-life, stated, “I have no idea mathematically — the number of frozen embryos, is it one, 10, 100, 1,000? Things like that matter.” Unfortunately, this was less than the usually strongly pro-life answer one would have expected. Former President Donald Trump, also reliably pro-life, said that he supported IVF and that Alabama lawmakers should act to protect it. And the executive director of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, the Senate campaign arm of Republicans, said the party’s candidates should “align with the public’s overwhelming support for I.V.F.”[4]
This decision by the Alabama Supreme Court is only days old, but the political battle has already reached near-nuclear levels. The full consequences will likely not be known for years. However, the decision by the Alabama Supreme Court moves the anti-abortion, and pro-life, struggle forward one more baby step at a time.
Addendum:
Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey signed a bill into law on March 6, 2024 protecting in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments after a February decision by the state Supreme Court led some fertility clinics to pause their procedures.
The governor signed a bill into law late Wednesday that offers protections for in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients and providers soon after it was passed by the Republican-led state Legislature.
The law says it will “provide civil and criminal immunity for death or damage to an embryo to any individual or entity when providing or receiving services related to in vitro fertilization.”
Sometimes baby steps take a step back, but we still move forward in that the Alabama Supreme Court ruling is still on record that an embryo is a child.
[1] https://2026.catholicinsight.com/recognizing-baby-steps/
[2] https://apnews.com/article/alabama-supreme-court-from-embryos-161390f0758b04a7638e2ddea20df7ca
[3] https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/23/opinion/alabama-frozen-embryos-children.html
[4] https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/25/us/politics/alabama-ivf-ruling-republicans-democrats.html
Saint Kateri , Canada’s Protectress
This was the title given to Saint Kateri Tekakwitha, by Pope Benedict XVI, when he canonized her on October 28th, 2012, along with six others, in Saint Peter’ Square (she had been beatified by Pope John Paul II back in 1980). With Saint Joseph as our protector, along with the Canadian martyrs, we seem to[…]Continue reading→
A Closed, Unsustainable, Descending Loop
As a follow-up to my thoughts on Payette’s payout, here be a stark image of where are here in Canada. As the graph shows in, well, graphic terms, since 2025, the public sector has contributed to 95.5% of economic growth. The private sector – which funds the public sector, or is supposed to – has[…]Continue reading→
Remembering Father Alphonse de Valk
(Today marks the sixth anniversary of the death of Father Alphonse de Valk, C.S.B., a faithful, courageous and indefatigable Basilian priest, pro-life-and-family apostle, and the founder of Catholic Insight magazine. Here is what we wrote those on his entering into eternity five years ago, as we continue to remember him in our prayers and thoughts)[…]Continue reading→
My Name is Bernadette
April 16th is a propitious day, for besides the anniversary of Father de Valk’s death, who founded Catholic Insight in its print form decades ago, and the commemoration of the ‘two Benedicts’, mentioned in accompanying posts, today we also recall Saint Bernadette Soubirous, the young visionary to whom the Virgin Mary appeared numerous times at[…]Continue reading→
Presidential Pardon of Weronika Krawczyk
As a good news, follow-up to our story from Poland, of the persecution of Weronika Krawczyk for her pro-life views, we heard that she has been granted a presidential pardon. One might still wonder why one needs a presidential pardon for simply holding the long-held belief that the child within the womb is a child,[…]Continue reading→
Canonizing Sister Faustina and Divine Mercy
HOMILY OF THE HOLY FATHER MASS IN ST PETER’S SQUARE FOR THE CANONIZATION OF SR MARY FAUSTINA KOWALSKA Sunday, 30 April 2000 1. “Confitemini Domino quoniam bonus, quoniam in saeculum misericordia eius”; “Give thanks to the Lord for he is good; his steadfast love endures for ever” (Ps 118: 1). So the Church sings on the Octave of[…]Continue reading→
Divine Mercy Sunday – An Echo of Every Mass
Reach out your hand and put it in my side. Do not doubt but believe’… ‘My Lord and my God!’ (Jn. 20:18)). Today is Divine Mercy Sunday, and as we celebrate the end of the Easter Octave, we contemplate the wounded side of our Saviour, the Church’s source of life. On Good Friday in the[…]Continue reading→
Pope Leo and a Rosary for Peace
Pope Leo XIV has asked Catholics across the world to join him in a Rosary for peace today, at 18:00 Rome time (6 pm), which would be noon from where I write (EST). If you are able, whether at that time or another, and in whatever way you pray, to join in intercession with the[…]Continue reading→
Payette’s Payout
I was glancing through some headlines, and noticed a mention of Julie Payette – engineer and astronaut and sometime the Queen’s representative in Canada – which brought back vague memories. She was appointed Governor-General by Justin Trudeau in 2017. Ms. Payette resigned in 2021, amidst claims that she created a ‘toxic work environment’, with allegations[…]Continue reading→
Saint Stanislaus of Szczepanów
We celebrate Saint Stanislaus today (+ April 11, 1079), in light of this Easter Octave, a bishop and martyr who accepted the episcopacy only at the direct order of Pope Alexander II. He proved a wise and courageous leader of his flock, put to death by his own king, Boleslaus, for rebuking the monarch’s ‘immoral[…]Continue reading→